This
hobby of mine has its origin in my childhood. When I was about ten,
somebody presented me with a broken Soviet camera Smena-8.
Its shutter was completely out of order. However, even in that poor
condition, the camera managed to arouse interest in photography. I got
hold of quite an old book entitled "25 Photography Lessons"
by V. Mikulin and started learning the theory. Meanwhile,
the camera was being repaired for me.
Unfortunately,
I failed to retain my first photos. Now I would pay a lot for any available
opportunity to have a look at them. Whatever you may say, photographs
are truly materialized pieces of memory that enable us to conjure up
emotions of the past.
My
favourite genre is city photography. I believe it to be gratifying for
both experienced photographers and beginners. Just start taking pictures
outdoors, and you will find the results quite interesting. If not, wait
for ten years. Cars, clothes, newsstands, shop windows almost
everything will be slightly different then. And your pictures will acquire
a historical value.
Although I have used many types of equipment and taken a lot of pictures
now, I remain only a keen amateur. I do not think it is bad. The difference
between an amateur and a pro is not in quality of their pictures. A
professional has to perform orders, therefore he must work to a deadline
and get results. An amateur does not have to hurry. He may carry out
experiments and make progress little by little. However it remains important
for him to improve his skills and not to wallow in ignorance. And, of
course, the last idea can be said not only to a photographer, but to
any other person as well.
At
present I shoot mainly with two cameras: Pentax MZ-7 (ZX-7) with several
lenses and Yashica T5. And from time to time I take my old Smena-8 with
me. After all, brandnames do not matter. What really matters is a photographer's
ability to achieve good results with the help of available equipment.
Best
regards
Igor
May
2002